Quimby v. King
Quimby v. King
43 N.J.L. 454
Quimby v. King
Opinion of the Court
The judge, in accordance with the directions of the one hundred and thirty-eighth section of the Practice act, amended the pleadings for the purpose of determining, in the existing suit, the real question in controversy between the
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Clement, Cole, Dodd, Green, Whittaker. 11.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.