Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1881

Quimby v. King

Quimby v. King
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 15, 1881
43 N.J.L. 454

Quimby v. King

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judge, in accordance with the directions of the one hundred and thirty-eighth section of the Practice act, amended the pleadings for the purpose of determining, in the existing suit, the real question in controversy between the *455parties. There was no error in this, and consequently there was no error in the refusal to charge complained of, which was correct in view of the amendment.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Parker, Reed, Van Syckel, Clement, Cole, Dodd, Green, Whittaker. 11.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.