Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887

State ex rel. Randolph v. Wood

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1887 · Affirmance, Brown, Clement, Dixon, Eeed, McGregor, None, Paterson, Reversal, Scudder, Syckel, Whitaker

50 N.J.L. 175; 15 A. 271; 1887 N.J. LEXIS 5

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court in its opinion.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Eeed, Scudder, Yan Syckel, Brown, Clement, McGregor, Paterson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.