Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887

Inhabitants of Eatontown v. Wolley

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1887 · Affirmance, Beown, Chancelloe, Clement, Mague, McGregor, None, Pateeson, Reed, Reversal, Scuddee, Syckel, Whitakee

50 N.J.L. 177; 17 A. 1103; 1887 N.J. LEXIS 1

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scuddee, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, McGregor, Pateeson, Whitakee. 11. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.