Mount v. Slack

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mount v. Slack, 45 N.J. Eq. 889 (N.J. 1889)
Dixon

Mount v. Slack

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the vice-ordinary.

Dissenting Opinion

Mr. Justice Dixon

(dissenting) stated orally that, in his opinion, the commissions in this case ought to have been divided equally between the two administrators.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Depue, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Brown, Clement, Cole, McGregor, Smith —10.

For reversal — Dixon, Van Syckel, Whitaker — 3.

Reference

Full Case Name
George W. Mount v. Clarence M. Slack
Status
Published