This court agrees with his Honor, the vice-chancellor, that the complainant has failed to establish by his testimony the existence of a nuisance, and the decree is consequently affirmed.

The other matters discussed in the opinion in the court of chancery have not been considered by this court.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiep-Justice, Depue, Diícon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Scudder, Van Syckel, Brown, Smith, Whitaker — 11.

For reversal — None.