Haring v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Haring v. State, 53 N.J.L. 664 (N.J. 1891)
24 Vroom 664; 23 A. 581; 1891 N.J. LEXIS 17

Haring v. State

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

We agree with the opinion of the Supreme Court except so far as it construes the act of March 30th, 1887. It is unnecessary to pass upon that part of the opinion, because we find the act to be unconstitutional.

Let the judgment below be affirmed.

.For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 9.

For reversal—None.

Reference

Full Case Name
JOHN L. HARING, IN ERROR v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, IN ERROR
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published