Haring v. State
Haring v. State
53 N.J.L. 664; 24 Vroom 664; 23 A. 581; 1891 N.J. LEXIS 17
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kerlin v. Maher (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1947)
- Mayer v. Oxidation Products Co., Inc. (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1932)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We agree with the opinion of the Supreme Court except so far as it construes the act of March 30th, 1887. It is unnecessary to pass upon that part of the opinion, because we find the act to be unconstitutional.
Let the judgment below be affirmed.
.For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Mague, Reed, Scudder, Brown, Clement, Smith, Whitaker. 9.
For reversal—None.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.