Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1892

State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley

State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1892 · Dixon
55 N.J.L. 107; 26 Vroom 107; 25 A. 260; 1892 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 7

State ex rel. Corwin v. Markley

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dixon, J.

Immediately after the passage of the resolution of March 22d, 1892, considered in Markley v: The Borough-of Cape May Point, the council of the borough appointed the-relator to fill the alleged vacancy in the office of borough collector, and he now asks for a mandamus- directing the respondent to deliver to him the official money and property.

*108As we have adjudged the resolution to be illegal, it follows that the respondent was still lawfully entitled to the office, =and the appointment of the relator was invalid. Of course, •therefore, the mandamus cannot be allowed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.