Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1893

Robbins v. Vanderbeck

Robbins v. Vanderbeck
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 15, 1893
55 N.J.L. 364; 26 Vroom 364; 26 A. 919; 1893 N.J. LEXIS 28
Robbins v. Vanderbeck

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Error is assigned upon a judgment of non-suit ordered at the Circuit. Question touching such a judgment must be presented by a bill of exceptions, returned with the writ of error. In place of such a bill in the present case, counsel seek to substitute their stipulation. Such stipulation will not answer. In absence of the bill of exceptions, error cannot be assigned upon matter which such bill should contain, neither can the judgment below be reversed. Rev., p. 887, § 245.

The judgment will be affirmed.

*365For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Magie, Reed, Van Syckel,, Bogert, Brown, Clement, Smith. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.