Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1893

State v. Mayor of Rutherford

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 15, 1893

56 N.J.L. 340; 29 A. 156; 27 Vroom 340; 1893 N.J. LEXIS 1

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

McNALLYS. v. Tp. of Teaneck (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1975)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In affirming the judgment of the Supreme Court in this case, this court does not decide whether the expense of searching the title of the land within the avenue is assessable as *341part of the cost of “ grading.” The reasons assigned do not cover such an objection, and the unquestionable expenses of the grading were sufficient to make up the total sum assessed.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Reed, Van Syokel, Bogert, Brown, Phelps, Smith. 9.

For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.