Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct, 58 N.J.L. 695 (N.J. 1896)
34 A. 1099; 29 Vroom 695; 1896 N.J. LEXIS 61

Kountze v. Proprietors of the Morris Aqueduct

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The legal questions involved in this ease were, we think, rightly dealt with in the opinion of the Supreme Court. The matters of fact decided in that court are not subject to review in the Court of Errors.

The judgment below must be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief • Justice, Depue, Dixon, Gummere, Ludlow, Barkalow, Bogert, Nixon. 9.

For reversal—None.

Reference

Full Case Name
LUTHER KOUNTZE, IN ERROR v. THE PROPRIETORS OF THE MORRIS AQUEDUCT, IN ERROR
Cited By
21 cases
Status
Published