Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1897

Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117

Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided October 17, 1897 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison, Hendrickson, Lippincott, Nikon, Syckel, Vredenburgh
57 N.J. Eq. 338; 45 A. 1092; 1898 N.J. LEXIS 78

Counsel

Mr. Howard W. Hayes, for the appellants., Mr. Adrian Biker, for the respondent.

Manning v. Columbian Lodge, No. 117

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given in- the court of chancery.

For affirmance — Collins, Depue, Dixon, Garrison; Lippincott, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nikon, Vredenburgh — 11. • ■ -

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.