Benton v. City of Elizabeth
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Kirzenbaum v. Paulus (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1959)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Understanding that the majority opinion of the Supreme Court does not affirm a right in the National Transit Company to operate a pipe line in this state, but, in absence of any- question upon that point, merely assumes, for the purpose of reaching the points mooted, that the company named has authority from this state to lay a pipe line, we vote to affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in that opinion.
. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Lippincott, Adams, Bogert, ’Hendrickson, Nixon. 7.
For reversal—Gummere, Ludlow, Vredenburgh. 3.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.