Benton v. City of Elizabeth
Benton v. City of Elizabeth
61 N.J.L. 693; 32 Vroom 693; 40 A. 1132; 1898 N.J. LEXIS 33
Benton v. City of Elizabeth
Opinion of the Court
Understanding that the majority opinion of the Supreme Court does not affirm a right in the National Transit Company to operate a pipe line in this state, but, in absence of any- question upon that point, merely assumes, for the purpose of reaching the points mooted, that the company named has authority from this state to lay a pipe line, we vote to affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in that opinion.
. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Lippincott, Adams, Bogert, ’Hendrickson, Nixon. 7.
For reversal—Gummere, Ludlow, Vredenburgh. 3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.