Benton v. City of Elizabeth
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Benton v. City of Elizabeth, 61 N.J.L. 693 (N.J. 1898)
32 Vroom 693; 40 A. 1132; 1898 N.J. LEXIS 33
Benton v. City of Elizabeth
Opinion of the Court
Understanding that the majority opinion of the Supreme Court does not affirm a right in the National Transit Company to operate a pipe line in this state, but, in absence of any- question upon that point, merely assumes, for the purpose of reaching the points mooted, that the company named has authority from this state to lay a pipe line, we vote to affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in that opinion.
. For affirmance—The Chancellor, Depue, Lippincott, Adams, Bogert, ’Hendrickson, Nixon. 7.
For reversal—Gummere, Ludlow, Vredenburgh. 3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- THOMAS H. BENTON, IN ERROR v. CITY OF ELIZABETH, IN ERROR
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published