Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1900

Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co.

Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1900 · Syckel
64 N.J.L. 579; 35 Vroom 579; 46 A. 770; 1900 N.J. LEXIS 134

Counsel

For the plaintiff in error, Thomas F. Noonan, Jr., For the defendant in error, Vredenburgh & Garretson.

Noonan v. Consolidated Traction Co.

Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

This is a suit for damages for personal injury received by the plaintiff in collision with a trolley car of defendant company while he was riding, by invitation and without hire, in a carriage owned and driven by Ralph Earle.

The trial j udge nonsuited the plaintiff by imputing to him the negligence of the driver.

This was error, as has been held in Consolidated Traction Co. v. Hoimark, recently decided by this court and reported in 31 Vroom 456. See, also, New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Co. v. Steinbrenner, 18 Id. 161.

The judgment below should be reversed.

*580For affirmance—Ludlow. 1.

For reversal—Magie (Chancellor), Depue (Chief Justice), Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Bogert, Hendrickson, Adams, Voorhees. 11.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.