Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1901

Bernheimer v. Verdon

Bernheimer v. Verdon
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 19, 1901 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gummere, Hendrickson, Krueger, None, Reversal, Sycicel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom
63 N.J. Eq. 312; 18 Dickinson 312; 49 A. 732; 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184

Bernheimer v. Verdon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from by both sides in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery, except that the date of January 31st, 1900, stated by mistake in the decree, should be changed to January 31st, 1899.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Sycicel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.