Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1901

Bernheimer v. Verdon

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 19, 1901 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gummere, Hendrickson, Krueger, None, Reversal, Sycicel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

63 N.J. Eq. 312; 18 Dickinson 312; 49 A. 732; 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Howard v. McPhail (R.I. 1914)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from by both sides in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery, except that the date of January 31st, 1900, stated by mistake in the decree, should be changed to January 31st, 1899.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Sycicel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.