Bernheimer v. Verdon

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Bernheimer v. Verdon, 63 N.J. Eq. 312 (N.J. 1901)
18 Dickinson 312; 49 A. 732; 1901 N.J. LEXIS 184
Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gummere, Hendrickson, Krueger, None, Reversal, Sycicel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

Bernheimer v. Verdon

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from by both sides in this ease is affirmed, for the reasons given in the court of chancery, except that the date of January 31st, 1900, stated by mistake in the decree, should be changed to January 31st, 1899.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Sycicel, Dixon, Garrison, Gummere, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—15. For reversal—None.

Reference

Full Case Name
Simon E. Bernheimer v. William P. Verdon
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published