Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Conger
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court vas delivered by
The result of allowing the mandamus applied for in this case will be to direct that the clerk of Middlesex county shall permit the chosen freeholders of-that county access to-the -books of records of deeds of said county and the indexes thereof now existing, and, if need be, for their purposes, -to-
The clerks of counties in this state are provided for by the constitution and are elected by the people, with a tenure of office of five years. Const., art. 7, § 2, ¶ 6.
The duties of clerks of counties are defined by the constitution, and they are, in addition to being clerks of the Courts of Common Pleas and Quarter Sessions, “to perform the duties and be subject to the regulations now required of them by law, until otherwise ordained by the legislature.” Const., art. 10, ¶ 11.
The rights and duties of clerks of counties are therefore fixed by the constitution of 1844 as they then existed by law, and are so to continue “until otherwise ordained by the legislature.”
It is a noteworthy fact that the act concerning- the clerks of the Court of Common Pleas and General Quarter Sessions, approved April 17th, 1846, should have used in its first section the expression, “that every person who shall be elected clerk of the Court of Common Pleas and General Quarter Sessions for either of the counties of this state shall give bond,” &c. Fo person is in fact elected clerk of the said courts, hut the county clerk is made clerk thereof by the constitution as a part of his duties. A careful examination of the statutes relating to the clerk will show that sections 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 12 of the act of 1846 are a practical reproduction of sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 of the act of March 2d, 1820. Elm. Dig., tit. "Clerks,” p. 74.
The only section omitted from the act of 1846 which was in thé act of 1820 was section 6, which prohibited the clerk holding also the office of surrogate, and, since, by our constitution, the surrogate became a constitutional officer with the clerk, it is evident that this was left out because this could not occur under the constitution'of 1844. The new sections
An act for the recording of mortgages by the clerk of the Court of Common Pleas was also passed June 7th, 1799, to which right of access and “to search the same” was given to every person “paying the fees allowed by law.”
The act of 1846 has made no change in the duties or powers of the clerk which existed prior to 1844, and, by the express provision of the constitution above cited, there being no change in the law, whatever rights the clerk then had or whatever duties were then required, still exist, unless they have been changed in some way by the revision of the act respecting conveyances in 1898. Pamph. L., p. 610.
A careful examination of that act fails to disclose any change in the control of the clerk over the records of deeds and mortgages: Section 21 of the act of 1898 expressly pro
The revision of 1898 has cast no less duties on the clerk, but has added additional ones. If combination indexes are to be made, he is to make them, when the board of chosen freeholders so determines. He is the sole and exclusive custodian of the books, records and papers in his office, subject only to the right of access by the public for the examination thereof, and for searches and transcripts therefrom, upon the-payment of the legal fees. Any indexing which, under existing statutes, may be lawfully authorized by the board of chosen freeholders to be done, he is entitled, and he alone authorized, to do. He is charged with the care and custody and the accounting to his successor for “the books, papers, records, writings and every document appertaining' to said office.”' Gen. Stat., p. 840, § 15
We have hot considered it necessary to decide the question whether the hoard of freeholders have the authority to order the work proposed to be done, as to past records, under section 51 of the Conveyance act of 1898, which seems to be the only provision so permitting, but, if they have such authority as to past, as well as to present and future records, we still think that the only person they can authorize under the statute to make the indexes is the clerk of the Court of Common Pleas.
The writ of mandamus is denied.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.