Hoboken v. Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Hoboken v. Jersey City, 68 N.J.L. 607 (N.J. 1902)
53 A. 595; 1902 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 4
Garretson, Garrison

Hoboken v. Jersey City

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The allowance of this writ would be futile, in view of section 6 of the act of March 23d, 1900. Pamph. L., p. 502. The object of the prosecutor is to affect the apportionment of taxes for the current year. The return mentioned in section 3 has been filed. The proviso of section 6 provides that such a reduction as is sought by the prosecutor shall not effect any change in the current apportionment. It is therefore useless to grant the writ. This renders it unnecessary to consider whether the writ would lie.

The rule to show cause is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
HOBOKEN v. JERSEY CITY
Status
Published