Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

McMullin v. Doughty

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Chiee, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garrison, Hendrickson, Krueger, None, Pitney, Reversal, Syokel, Vredenburgh, Vroom

63 N.J. Eq. 800; 18 Dickinson 800; 52 A. 1132; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 195

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 252.

For affirmance—The Chiee-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vroom—13. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.