Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Duffy v. Hargan

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Iiee, Krueger, None, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Vooritees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

63 N.J. Eq. 802; 18 Dickinson 802; 52 A. 1131; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 190

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 588.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Vooritees, Vroom —15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.