Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Hancock v. Elmer

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Krueger, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

63 N.J. Eq. 802; 18 Dickinson 802; 52 A. 1131; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 189

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey delivered in the court' below. See 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 558.

For affirmance—^The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Pitney, Bogert, Krueger, Adams, VredenBURGH, VOORHEES—10. For reversal—Dixon, Collins, Hendrickson, Vroom—4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.