Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Hanneman v. Richter

Hanneman v. Richter
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Hone, Krueger, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom
63 N.J. Eq. 803; 52 A. 1131; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191

Hanneman v. Richter

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.