Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Hanneman v. Richter

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Hone, Krueger, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom

63 N.J. Eq. 803; 52 A. 1131; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 191

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re Klein's Estate (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1955)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated by the chancellor in the opinion delivered in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 365.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—Hone.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.