Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Hemsley v. Marlborough Hotel Co.

Hemsley v. Marlborough Hotel Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 23, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Arretson, Bogert, Collins, Dixon, Fort, Garrison, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredbnburgh, Vroom
63 N.J. Eq. 804; 52 A. 1132; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 197

Hemsley v. Marlborough Hotel Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Reed filed in the court below. See 17 Dick. Ch. Rep. 164.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Collins, Fort, G-arretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Vredbnburgh, Voorhees, Vroom—14. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.