Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

State v. Hatfield

State v. Hatfield
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 3, 1902
67 N.J.L. 354; 38 Vroom 354; 51 A. 1109; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 120
State v. Hatfield

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Two eases with the above title were argued together.

The judgment in each of them is affirmed, for the reasons given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court. 37 Vroom 443.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Van Syckel, Garretson, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Krueger, Adams, Vredenburgh, Voorhees, Vroom. 12.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.