Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 17, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Iees, None, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Yoori, Yredenburgh, Yroom
68 N.J.L. 413; 53 A. 1125; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 176

Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in that court, reported as Coles v. Midland Telephone and Telegraph Co. 38 Vroom 490.

*414For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins, Fort, Garretson,_ Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑