Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1902

Coles v. Midland Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 17, 1902 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Collins, Fort, Garretson, Iees, None, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Yoori, Yredenburgh, Yroom

68 N.J.L. 413; 53 A. 1125; 1902 N.J. LEXIS 176

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Borough of Merchantville v. Malik & Son (072255) (N.J. 2014)
State v. Rowland (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in that court, reported as Coles v. Midland Telephone and Telegraph Co. 38 Vroom 490.

*414

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Yan Syckel, Collins, Fort, Garretson,_ Pitney, Bogert, Adams, Yredenburgh, Yoori-iees, Yroom. 12. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.