New Jersey Junction Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey City
New Jersey Junction Railroad v. Mayor of Jersey City
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an application to have the Supreme Court determine whether or not the property known as “Plot 29, in Block 545, in Jersey City,” should have been assessed, for the years 1897 to 1902, inclusive, by the local taxing authorities or by the state board of assessors. This precise issue between these same parties was adjudicated as to the taxes for the year 1896 in the case reported in 34 Vroom 120. It is contended, on behalf of Jersey City, that this prior decision is riot conclusive — 'thát is to say, that the doctrine of res Judicata does .not apply, because (I quote from the brief .of counsel) “the question presented to the Supreme Court in that 'case and the case that was actually determined in. that case, was whether or not,. at' the time referred to in the case, to wit, in 1896, the property in question was being held by the railroad company with a present manifest intention for its future use for railroad property.' The court found that-the evidence presented justified the conclusion that at that time there was a manifest intention to hold the property for railroad purposes.”
The property for the years 1897 to 1902, inclusive, was taxed by the state board of assessors as property used for railroad purposes, and the taxes for those years assessed by the municipal authorities of .Jersey City must be set aside.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NEW JERSEY JUNCTION RAILROAD COMPANY v. MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF JERSEY CITY
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published