Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Siegman v. Day

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 11, 1903 · Affirmance, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Syckel, Yoorhees, Yredenburgi, Yroom

65 N.J. Eq. 374; 20 Dickinson 374; 54 A. 1125; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 288

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The facts set out in the bill of complaint in this cause are, in their legal effect, identical with those exhibited in the bill in the ease of Siegman v. Maloney, decided at the present term of this court. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case, the decree brought up ,by this appeal should be affirmed. '

*375

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Yredenburgi-i, Yoorhees, Yroom — 10.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.