Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Mullaney v. Mullaney

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 4, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Denburgh, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Iiee, Pitney, Reversal, Syckel, Voorhees, Vre, Vroom

65 N.J. Eq. 384; 54 A. 1086; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 280

Counsel

Mr. Charles L. Corbin, for the appellants., Mr. Clarence Linn, for the respondent.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the court below.

For affirmance — The Ci-iiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VOORHEES, VROOM — 11. For reversal — Dixon—1.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.