Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Ballinger v. Wilson

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 11, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Green, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Syckel, Yoorhees, Yredenburgh, Yroom

65 N.J. Eq. 403; 54 A. 1125; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 287

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

In the making of the decree appealed from there was no error which was prejudicial to the appellant. Upon the proofs submitted the respondents were entitled to recover from the appellant, at the very least, the $50 ordered to be paid by him. to the respondents.

The decree should be affirmed.

*404

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yoorhees, Yroom, Green- — -14.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.