Bulat v. Londrigan

Supreme Court of New Jersey June 19, 1903

Bulat v. Londrigan, 65 N.J. Eq. 718 (N.J. 1903)

20 Dickinson 718; 60 A. 1133; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314

Affirmance, Bogert, Ciiiee, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Iees, Reversal, Swayze, Syckel, Voori, Vredenburgh, Vroom

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11. For reversal — Hendrickson—1.

Reference

Full Case Name: Marco Bulat v. Eliza Londrigan
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published