Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Bulat v. Londrigan

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 19, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Ciiiee, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Iees, Reversal, Swayze, Syckel, Voori, Vredenburgh, Vroom

65 N.J. Eq. 718; 20 Dickinson 718; 60 A. 1133; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 314

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered by him in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 22.

For affirmance — The Ciiiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Voori-iees, Vroom — 11. For reversal — Hendrickson—1.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.