Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Perrine v. Perrine

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 19, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Chiee, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Hendrickson, Iees, Reversal, Swayze, Syckel, Voori, Vredenburgi, Vroom

65 N.J. Eq. 719; 20 Dickinson 719; 60 A. 1134; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 315

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7. For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.