Schultz v. Van Doren

Supreme Court of New Jersey August 25, 1903

Schultz v. Van Doren, 65 N.J. Eq. 764 (N.J. 1903)

55 A. 1133; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304

Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Garrison, Green, Hendrickson, Iees, Pitney, Port, Swayze, Syokel, Voori, Vredenburgi, Vroom

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: Emil Schultz, Jr. v. Howard J. Van Doren
Status: Published