Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Schultz v. Van Doren

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided August 25, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Garrison, Green, Hendrickson, Iees, Pitney, Port, Swayze, Syokel, Voori, Vredenburgi, Vroom

65 N.J. Eq. 764; 55 A. 1133; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 304

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 465.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syokel, Dixon, Garrison, Port, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voori-iees, Vroom, Green- — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.