Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Holmes v. Sheridan

Holmes v. Sheridan
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided August 25, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Fort, Garrison, Green, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredenburgi, Vroom
65 N.J. Eq. 765; 56 A. 308; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 307

Holmes v. Sheridan

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this case is affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Stevens, filed in the court of chancery. See 56 Atl. Rep. 308.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Voorhees, Vroom, Green — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.