Black v. Hobart Trust Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey November 16, 1903

Black v. Hobart Trust Co., 65 N.J. Eq. 769 (N.J. 1903)

20 Dickinson 769; 56 A. 1131; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 308

Affirmance, Bogert, Chiee, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Syckel, Voorhees, Vroom

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons given by Vice-Chancellor Pitney, in his opinion filed in the court of chancery, and reported in 19 Dick. Ch. Rep. 415.

For affirmance — Ti-ib Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze., Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom, Green, Gray — 14.

For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: Charles C. Black, receiver, &c. v. Hobart Trust Company, and
Status: Published