Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Perrine v. Wimpfheimer

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 16, 1903 · Adams, Affirmance, Bogert, Burgi, Collins, Depue, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gummere, Hendrickson, Iees, Syckel, Voori, Vreden, Vüoom

65 N.J. Eq. 770

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Talbot v. Jansen (Ark. 1988)
Osco Motors Corp. v. Martin (New Jersey Court of Chancery 1946)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from in this ease is affirmed. Opinion rendered by Justice Van Syckel. Sec opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery in the court of chancery, reported in 16 Dick. Ch. Rep. 126.

Note. — The opinion on the appeal was rendered June Term, 1901, but omitted from its proper place. See 50 Atl. Rep. 356.

For affirmance — Depue, Van Syckel, Garrison, Gummere, Fort, Collins, Garretson, Hendrickson, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-I, VoORI-IEES, VüOOM, ADAMS — 13.

For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.