Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath

Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 19, 1903 · Affirmance, Chibe, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Green, None, Reversal, Swayze, Syckel, Voorhees, Vredenburgh, Vroom
68 N.J.L. 731; 54 A. 1124; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 215
Liondale Bleach, Dye & Print Works v. McGrath

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this case is affirmed, for the reasons given by Mr. Justice Dixon in his opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Swayze, VredenBURGH, VOORHEES, VROOM, GREEN. 11. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.