Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1903

Dolton v. Sickel

Dolton v. Sickel
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 2, 1903 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Reversal, Voorhees, Vredenburgi, Vroom
68 N.J.L. 731; 39 Vroom 731; 54 A. 1124; 1903 N.J. LEXIS 214

Dolton v. Sickel

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court in this cause was entered upon the opinion of Mr. Justice Garrison, reported in 37 Vroom 492, which opinion adopted, in respect to one point involved, the opinion of the same justice in Yetter v. King Confectionery Co., reported in Id. 491.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion referred to-.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Bogert, Voorhees, Vroom. 8. For reversal—Dixon, Vredenburgi-i. 2.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.