Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904

Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.

Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided February 23, 1904 · Garretson, Garrison, Pur
70 N.J.L. 624; 41 Vroom 624; 60 A. 515; 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 212

Haag v. Elizabeth, Plainfield & Central Jersey Railway Co.

Opinion of the Court

Pur Curiam.

Tlie record before us consists of a state of demand, transcript of short-hand notes of testimony, a motion by the defendant for direction of a verdict at the close of the case, a refusal and the charge of the judge, all in a District Court. There is no verdict, no judgment, no state of the case agreed upon or slated, no appeal. The counsel for appellant, in his brief, says β€œthe rule to show cause should be made absolute.” Rules to show cause in cases tried in the District Courts cannot be brought before this court by appeal.

The appeal will be dismissed:

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.