Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1904

Hardcastle v. Stiles

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided September 30, 1904 · Affirmance, Ahiedenbuegii, Arrison, Bogert, Dixon, Fort, Gray, Green, None, Pitney, Reversal, Swayzb, Tiie, Vroom

70 N.J.L. 828; 59 A. 1117; 1904 N.J. LEXIS 172

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Van Syekel in the Supreme Court, reported, in 40 Vroom 551.

For affirmance — Tiie Chancellor., Dixon, G-arrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayzb, Bogert, AHiedenbuegii, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.