Conrad v. Broeker
Conrad v. Broeker
71 N.J.L. 341; 61 A. 1118; 1904 N.J. LEXIS 185
Conrad v. Broeker
Opinion of the Court
The state of the case furnished to the court discloses no exceptions authenticated by the judge upon which error has been assigned. For this omission the court deems it impossible to disturb the judgment, and it must therefore be affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray. 11.
For reversal — Hone.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.