Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1905

Boland v. Kaveny

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 20, 1905 · Bogert, Dismissal, Dixon, Garretson, Garrison, Green, Swayze, Ustice, Vredenburgh, Vroom

72 N.J.L. 314; 43 Vroom 314; 62 A. 552; 1905 N.J. LEXIS 125

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The state of the case discloses no record except of an order of the Supreme Court affirming a judgment of a District Court. There is no transcript, or pleadings, or state of the case. In this condition of the record before us, we think the writ of error should be dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief J ustice, Dixon, Garrison, Garretson, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green. 10.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.