Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1905

State v. Murdaca

State v. Murdaca
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided December 6, 1905 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dill, Dixon, Fort, Garretson, Garrison, Gray, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom
73 N.J.L. 679; 44 Vroom 679; 67 A. 1103; 1905 N.J. LEXIS 130

State v. Murdaca

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

An examination of the assignments of error and the bills of exceptions and the causes filed for reversal, and the entire record before us, discloses no ground for reversal.

The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Dixon, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill. 15. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.