Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906

Puster v. Parker Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1906 · Pee

70 N.J. Eq. 771; 67 A. 1102; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 153

Counsel

Mr. Robert H. Hudspeth and Mr. J. Merritt Lane, for the appellant., Mr. Robert M. Boyd, Jr., for the respondent.

Pee Curiam.

The order in this case is affirmed, for the reasons contained in the opinion delivered in the court of chancery by the chancellor.

Por affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vre-DENBURGH, VeOOM, GREEN, GRAY, Dll/L-14.

Por reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.