Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906

Eureka Fire Hose Co. v. Eureka Rubber Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 19, 1906 · Affirmance, Bogert, Garketson, Garrison, Gray, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Port, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgi, Vroom

71 N.J. Eq. 300; 1 Buchanan 300; 71 A. 1134; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 190

Opinion of the Court

.Per Curiam.

Tbe decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court of chancery by Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance—Garrison, Port, Garketson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Gray—10. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.