Dilks v. Kelsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey June 18, 1906

Dilks v. Kelsey, 73 N.J.L. 678 (N.J. 1906)

44 Vroom 678; 63 A. 1118; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103

Affirmance, Bogert, Cueiam, Fort, Gray, Greeij, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom

Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: SARAH DILKS, IN ERROR v. ORLANDO KELSEY, IN ERROR
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published