Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906

Dilks v. Kelsey

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1906 · Affirmance, Bogert, Cueiam, Fort, Gray, Greeij, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom

73 N.J.L. 678; 44 Vroom 678; 63 A. 1118; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 103

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Larned v. MacCarthy (N.J. 1914)
Scott v. Blakely (N.J. 1913)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Cueiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court, in proceedings under the Landlord and Tenant act, is now affirmed on the grounds stated in the per curiam memorandum filed in the Supreme Court, and reported in 59 Atl. Rep. 897.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Fort, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Greeij, Gray. 10. For reversal. — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.