Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906

State v. Harned

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1906 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom

73 N.J.L. 681; 64 A. 1134; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Njspca v. Bd. of Ed. of East Orange (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.