Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1906

State v. Harned

State v. Harned
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 18, 1906 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, None, Pitney, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Vredenburgh, Vroom
73 N.J.L. 681; 64 A. 1134; 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106

State v. Harned

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.