Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1907

Siegman v. Electric Vehicle Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided March 26, 1907 · Affirmance, Bogert, Dill, Garretson, Garrison, Gray, Green, Hendrickson, Iard, Iiee, None, Pitney, Port, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenci, Vredenburgi, Vroom

72 N.J. Eq. 435; 2 Buchanan 435; 66 A. 1134; 1907 N.J. LEXIS 307

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This canse was argued together with Siegman v. Electric Vehicle Co. and Kissell, decided by this court at the present term, upon an opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Pitney, ante p. 403. The same question being presented in each of the two cases, the order under review herein will be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons given in that opinion.

For affirmance—The Ci-iiee-Justice, Garrison, Port, Garretson, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—15. For reversal—None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.