Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908

Albert v. Haeberly

Albert v. Haeberly
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided June 15, 1908 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Minturn, None, Parker, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Vooriiees, Vredenburgi, Vroom
74 N.J. Eq. 451; 4 Buchanan 451; 70 A. 1100; 1908 N.J. LEXIS 278

Albert v. Haeberly

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This cause was heard before the late Vice-Chancellor Grey, who expressed the view that the case was governed by the same legal principles that this court applied in a former litigation between the same parties (Albert v. Haeberly, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 664).

We concur in that view, and the decree under review should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Vooriiees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgi-i, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill-,-16. 'For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.