Hartman v. Hartman

Supreme Court of New Jersey November 16, 1908

Hartman v. Hartman, 74 N.J. Eq. 851 (N.J. 1908)

71 A. 417; 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286

Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Chiee, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Iees, Minturn, None, Parker, Reep, Reversal, Swayze, Trencharp, Voori, Vrepenburgh, Vroom

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name: Joseph J. Hartman, and v. Anna M. Hartman, and
Status: Published