Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1908

Hartman v. Hartman

Hartman v. Hartman
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Decided November 16, 1908 · Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Chiee, Dill, Garrison, Gray, Green, Iees, Minturn, None, Parker, Reep, Reversal, Swayze, Trencharp, Voori, Vrepenburgh, Vroom
74 N.J. Eq. 851; 71 A. 417; 1908 N.J. LEXIS 286

Hartman v. Hartman

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

This case involves only questions of fact. We agree with the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor. The decree under review should therefore be affirmed.

The application for counsel fee is denied.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reep, Trencharp, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,-Minturn, Bogert, Vrepenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill —16. For reversal — None.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑