Seymour v. Goodwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Seymour v. Goodwin, 74 N.J. Eq. 856 (N.J. 1908)
72 A. 123; 1908 N.J. LEXIS 292
Affirmance, Bergen, Bogert, Dill, Garrison, Grai, Green, Min, None, Reed, Reversal, Swayze, Trenchard, Turn, Yoorhees, Yredenburgh, Yroom

Seymour v. Goodwin

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

It has previously been decided that the -bill of complaint herein sets up a good cause of action. Seymour v. Goodwin, 68 N. J. Eq. (2 Robb.) 189; 69 N. J. Eq. (3 Robb.) 833. The cause came on to final hearing before Vice-Chancellor Stevens, who held that the material allegations of the bill were sustained by the evidence, and thereupon advised a final decree for the complainant. We agree with his conclusions, -and the decree should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

*857For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bergen, Yoorhees, 'Min-turn, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Yroom, Green, Grai, Dill —15. For reversal — None.

Reference

Full Case Name
James M. Seymour, Jr., and v. Rebecca Goodwin, &c., of Hannibal Goodwin, and
Status
Published